Sorry for the long break in posts. I've been very busy lately and it's been Easter holidays (I don't have Internet at home).
I just want to leave you with the thought: Why should the burden of proof that eating meat supports inhumane farming practices lie with vegetarians? Surely it is meat-eaters who should prove to the world that the industry they support is not harmful. Since it is very possible (and is commonly the case) that animals are being mistreated in farming practices, why don't we rather err on the side of caution, i.e. let's not eat meat unless we know where the meat comes from and how those animals were/are treated?
No comments:
Post a Comment